Elon Musk has five sons. In 2013, when asked about his time with them, he said, “What I find is I’m able to be with them and still be on email. I can be with them and still be working at the same time…If I didn’t, I wouldn’t be able to get my job done.”
Would most women have said the same thing?
The Mom Penalty
But that subset is small.
You can see below that other categories of women who are comparable to men in every other way get paid less:
The 4% Plunge
The number to remember is 4%. A mom’s wages plunge 4% per child. But it gets even worse because your affluence counts. For the top 10%, the motherhood penalty pretty much disappears. However, with the lower wage earner, it is 6%.
Hypothesizing why, we can cite a list of reasons.
Women could earn less because they…
- Spend more time at home to be with children.
- Select lower paid mom-friendly jobs.
- Have less energy and more distractions at work because of children.
- Experience employer discrimination.
The Dad Bonus
The fatherhood wage bonus:
Our Bottom Line: Confirmation Bias
So yes, Elon Musk might be disparaged less for working when with his children than a mom. And, as a white highly educated dad, he has the biggest boost from the fatherhood bonus.
My sources and more: Recently, articles about professional women and children are everywhere. WSJ spoke about female innovators and the NY Times, about the economics profession (as did econlife). Meanwhile, these recent papers, here and here, and summaries of studies, refer to the motherhood penalty. And BusinessInsider had the Elon Musk fatherhood quote.
Ideal for the classroom, econlife.com reflects Elaine Schwartz’s work as a teacher and a writer. As a teacher at the Kent Place School in Summit, NJ, she’s been an Endowed Chair in Economics and chaired the history department. She’s developed curricula, was a featured teacher in the Annenberg/CPB video project “The Economics Classroom,” and has written several books including Econ 101 ½ (Avon Books/Harper Collins). You can get econlife on a daily basis! Head to econlife.
No comments:
Post a Comment